DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
SIN
Docket No:
28 April 201
This is in reference to your Application for Correction of
Military Records, DD Form 149, received on 11 February 2015,
in which you requested a copy of your Certificate of Release or
Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214). Please be advised that
your request is not under the purview of this Board, but under
the cognizance of the National Personnel Records, 9700 Page
Boulevard, St. Louis, Missouri 63132. I have enclosed a Standard
Form 180 with instructions on how to request a copy of your
official record. As a result of the foregoing, no action i
required by this Board at this time. Accordingly, your cas
hereby administratively closed without action.
regardin matter
Our point of contact
he may be reached at
Please do not hesitate { iF you need
assistance.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03662-11
Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery of the alleged error. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Because of the large number of requests, processing of medal requests can take many months.
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00557_Redacted
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN a AMN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW oe NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY ISSUES A94.11 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 A94.05 2_|APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 {LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING...
AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2009-00447
- RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150--- 2 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2009-00447 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and | authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. Military legal counsel has been obtained to assist you.
AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2009-00687
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW a B NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN voTHc | OTHER DENY X+ X+ X+ X+ X+ ISSUES A94,53 INDEX NUMBER A67.05 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 {APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL...
AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2009-00088_Redacted
The record indicates that the applicant was discharged for Misconduct—Drug Abuse. J am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for drug abuse. For the reasons set forth above, I recommend the Respondent be discharged from the United States Air Force for drug abuse under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.54, with a General discharge.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07055-10
Those administrative measures must be exhausted before any action can be taken by this Board. Laches is a legal doctrine that essentially states that a claim will not be allowed if a delay in asserting the claim has prejudiced another party. Accordingly, it is particularly important in your case to provide DFAS with evidence that supports your claim that you are entitled to back pay and that you provide an explanation as to why you neglected to assert this claim for so long.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03437-11
Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery of the alleged error. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the © burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of > probable material error or injustice. Because of the ‘large number of requests, processing of medal requests can take many months.
NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00420
and document #14 through #18). I do not deny the findings as recorded at my Administrative Discharge Board (please refer to Document #1 paragraph 1.e.).2. At this time the applicant has not provided sufficient documentation of good character and conduct.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00309
The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15 for misconduct. APPLICATION FOR THE REVIEW OF DISCHARGE FROM THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES (Please read instructions on Pages 3 and 4 BEFORE completing this application.) APPLICANT DATA (The person whose discharge is to be reviewed).
AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2009-00725
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2009-00725 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. ‘ CONDUCT A RECORD REVIEW OF MY DISCHARGE BASED ON MY...